<![CDATA[Humanus - Securitas - Humanus - Securitas]]>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 04:51:59 -0500Weebly<![CDATA[Katrina 10 Years on Originally  Posted  with The Center for Climate and Security]]>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:08:23 GMThttp://ts-lite.com/1/post/2015/08/katrina-10-years-on-originally-posted-with-the-center-for-climate-and-security.htmlCoastal Cities, Climate and Security: Lessons from Katrina 10 Years Later

 By guest author, Lieutenant Colonel Gary Sargent, USA (ret)

Tomorrow, August 29th, marks 10 years since Hurricane Katrina ripped through New Orleans, and Americans viewed the wholesale destruction of a major US city by water and wind. Katrina presented a worrying picture of what may befall other coastal cities around the globe as water levels rise and the world faces a much more challenging, changing climate. Ten years later, lessons from the disaster are more relevant than ever.

A forgotten disaster

Politicians, policy makers, and military strategists have in some respects forgotten Hurricane Katrina in the last decade. After all, a lot has happened since then, including a global financial crisis and a wave of instability across the Arab world.

However, lessons from Katrina still lurk in the back of our minds. Most audiences recall the much-maligned emergency responses on the local, state and federal levels. Post-Katrina discussions revolved around absence of leadership, poorly constructed levees, and a regional infrastructure and political culture that was not resilient. The death toll and financial costs of Katrina have not yet been surpassed in the United States. However, in light of sea level rise, and the projected increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, the experience of New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina could be an indicator of a new normal for the world’s coastal cities.

Cities and security in a changing climate

Though New Orleans is a relatively small city, in terms of population, the Katrina disaster provides a glimpse into what we may be facing on a global scale when a changing climate meets the increasingly uncontrolled spaces of the world’s growing coastal cities – particularly, existing and future megacities.

The growth of megacities in areas of the world that are especially vulnerable to climate change, specifically sea level rise, is cause for serious concern. Namely, there are significant unknowns associated with the interaction of climatic and environmental threats with the stability of urban environments, as well as the broader security consequences of the destabilization of such megacities.

The question that must be asked and answered, sooner rather than later, is: Do security risk mitigation professionals truly understand the security implications of climate change and rising sea-levels on coastal megacities?

As of yet, we do not have a sufficient answer to that question.

Nonetheless, there are indicators of an evolving approach to these issues from our institutions of national security. For example, on July 29th the Department of Defense (DoD) released a report titled, “National Security Implications of Climate-Related Risks and a Changing Climate.” It is a DoD response to a congressional request for information on how the Geographic Combatant Commands (GCCs) – who are the frontlines of U.S. military operations – are mitigating risk in a changing climate. In it, the DoD identifies notes that the “Combatant Commands [GCCs] are integrating climate-related impacts into their planning cycles.” This should not be surprising. Risk mitigation is what DoD and everyone working inside the U.S. national security infrastructure does on a daily basis. They are paid to be the “half empty” people in the room. They assume fact-based worst-case scenarios, as low probability events happen all the time, and they plan against those scenarios.

That said, preparation for worst-case scenarios, including the potentially destabilizing impacts of climate change on coastal megacities, could use some attention. For example, in a future of accelerating climate change and growing coastal urban environments, the GCCs may find themselves executing significant and deeply complex humanitarian operations in flooded megacities, such as Lagos, Nigeria, a city with nearly 30 million inhabitants and a history of political instability. But how the GCCs are preparing for, and assisting in preventing, these kinds of eventualities, remains unclear.

Looking back to look forward

In short, climate change, sea-level rise and an increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events are likely to exacerbate megacity vulnerabilities, and we need to better understand how that will affect local, national, regional and international security, in order to design better policy responses.

Over the course of the next year, I will contribute a series of articles to the Center for Climate and Security on this set of issues. The series will aim to illuminate a significant threat that strategic planning and policy professionals have only recently begun to consider.

<![CDATA[Leadership -  Albuqurque New Mexico - Ibiza Rooftop Bar]]>Fri, 01 May 2015 22:44:59 GMThttp://ts-lite.com/1/post/2015/05/leadership-albuqurque-new-mexico-ibiza-rooftop-bar.htmlOK, so was hoping my first notes would be about some profound event.  Especially after this week; Iran seizing cargo ships, EMP worries in the WSJ, Taliban offensive in Afghanistan, earthquake in Nepal, a volcano in Chile, and now an underwater volcano off the Oregon Coast.  But no, my worries today, outside of taking the red-eye back east is Leadership (or the lack of it).   Leadership is always a funny thing.  Some believe it is about calm cool management, others think its making a decision - right, wrong or indifferent but make a decision.  It is really a combination of a bunch of learned skill sets - and personality traits that allow a leader / manager (hate that word) to provide vision, guidance, mentorship, and a framework that rewards good behavior and effort, and limits stressors or mitigates risk (but not risk averse).  Good leaders do not want "yes" men and women, good leaders understand perfection is really not "reality" 80-90 percent is probably the best we can hope for, good leaders compromise - but don't give up everything, good leaders communicate well (which leads to effective collaboration and "buy-in"), good leaders understand their people, good leaders are team players (or at least can make the change if their personality is something different) and good leaders understand their own flaws and weaknesses.   It is those things combined with humility, intelligence, drive and dedication to ones peers, seniors, and subordinates that make one at least an effective leader.  Time and life experience plays a significant role as does your operational environment.  SO Why have I brought this all up, well I have just spent the last 6 years post Army dealing with a bunch of people in "leadership" positions that have no understanding what it takes to be an effective one or what it is.   The last two firms I worked for had people in power that lacked vision, didn't understand their current operating environment, claimed loyalty to their people when they had none, squandered advantage, and when it was all staring them in the face, they still didn't take advice.  Mind you not just mine, but the advice of other very smart people (I am not really all that smart or intellectually deep).  Both organizations made significant money very rapidly, and believed it was their personal intellect and  ideas that won them the business.  No it was a painful series of USG funding in a significant time of US military intervention with an underprepared military.  My thoughts out of this are, good leaders are  ]]>